A refugee
camp designed as a safe haven for Palestinians, the Yarmouk camp, has become
the most awful place on earth. It has been a shadow phase in Yarmouk camp since
two years where it has been completely isolated from the rest of the world. Yarmouk
camp was the first Palestinian refugee camp in 1957, situated in Damascus, Syria;
it’s a gate way to enter into the capital. As a result of the Arab – Israeli war, Palestinians took refuge
in Yarmouk and currently it is a ground for an armed conflict between Syrian
government and the rebels (Free Syrian Army and al - Nusra) who are pro democrats
trying to overthrow the authoritarian regime of President Bashar – al – assad. As the civil war in Syria spread
sporadically, it turned Yarmouk camp into despair. Yarmouk has the most number
of civilians trapped, around 18000, where the residents are the prisoners of
siege. Throughout the uprising, the
residents of the camp, mainly the Palestinian refugees stayed neutral, this
attracted few Syrians who too were neutral in the conflict.
Syrian
government surrounded the camp creating siege, thereby cutting off food and
humanitarian aid to the civilians in the camp. This created a poignant
condition where the civilians had to feed on stray cats and dogs. Recently,
ISIL took over 90% of the camp’s territory, brutally beheading and mass killing
of Palestinian women, Christians, along with secularists.
There
has been an extensive tension inside the Yarmouk camp, between the three rebel
groups i.e., the Free Syrian Army, Jabhat al – nusra , and ISIL. This has
created a siege inside the siege. This ostensibly attracted the attention of the
international community, as it violated both international humanitarian law and
international human rights. This captivated the attention of United Nations
Relief and Agency work (UNRWA) for Palestine refugees, which was established by
the United Nations General Assembly after the Arab – Israel war, specifically
for the protection of Palestinian refugees. UNRWA extended the humanitarian aid
to the deteriorating humanitarian situation at the camp, which is at the brink
of humanitarian catastrophe. Assistance has been extended to both Palestinian
and Syrian family but was futile, as the internal rebels specially the ISIS were
isolating the civilians to ensure that the UNRWA assistance did not reach them.
The convoys were shot during the distribution of food or any other humanitarian
aid.
As
affirmed by the monist that International humanitarian law and International
human rights law co-exist, they have been blatantly breached in Syria.
Basic
principle of IHL such as distinguishing between civilians and non – civilians,
no direct attack against civilians are severely breached. Argument that the
civilians and non civilians are non distinguishable, as it is a civil upraising
cannot stand as the civilians of Yarmouk were neutral in their stand. According
to Article 50(3) of Additional protocol I of Geneva Convention the presence of
non civilians among the civilians do not deprive the population of civilian
character.
Further,
according to Article 54 of Additional Protocol I of Geneva Convention there is
express prohibition on starvation of civilian as a warfare method which is
noticeable in this regard. Further,
Syria being a signatory of the Chemical Weapon Convention 1993, which obligates
them to curtail the use of chemical weapon, which has not been the case here,
as Syria has made an overt use of Chemical Weapon (sarin gas) thereby killing
1400 people.
Syria
is a party to the international conventions like ICESR and ICCPR, hence it is
under the obligation to maintain the rights of civilians. Unfortunately the
basic rights of civilians is candidly taken away by the Syrian government
itself.
The
discussion on the violation of laws would be continued in the subsequent post.
Priyanka Vaidyanath (4th year student, School of Law, Christ University. She may be contacted at priyanka.vaidyanath@law.christuniversity.in)
Endnotes:
4. Ruth Abrilstoffels Legal
regulation of humanitarian assistance in armed conflict: Achievements and gaps,
, IRRC September 2004 Vol. 86 No 855.
5. Yoram Dinstein The Conduct of
Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge
University, 2004. (https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/2921-dinstein-the-conduct-of-hostilities-under-the-law)
No comments:
Post a Comment